Comments for Nuclear Weasels http://www.nuclearweasels.com Tech stuff from Dan Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:44:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 Comment on Mobile Device Wipe Works! by Taylor http://www.nuclearweasels.com/2009/05/mobile-device-wipe-works/comment-page-1/#comment-80 Taylor Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:44:35 +0000 http://www.nuclearweasels.com/2009/05/mobile-device-wipe-works/#comment-80 We fell out, I grew to dislike it after initially loving it. What can I say, I'm fickle! ~Dan We fell out, I grew to dislike it after initially loving it.

What can I say, I’m fickle!

~Dan

]]> Comment on Mobile Device Wipe Works! by marcus http://www.nuclearweasels.com/2009/05/mobile-device-wipe-works/comment-page-1/#comment-79 marcus Fri, 29 May 2009 22:28:38 +0000 http://www.nuclearweasels.com/2009/05/mobile-device-wipe-works/#comment-79 What happened to your Storm? What happened to your Storm?

]]> Comment on The big four oh by Bob http://www.nuclearweasels.com/2008/12/the-big-four-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-73 Bob Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:32:02 +0000 http://www.nuclearweasels.com/?p=106#comment-73 I see you are running Wordpress 2.7 as well Dan, very nice. That's quite the server farm you have going there. I will need to take a look at how many servers we have in back some time soon and list them as well. We will not beat you, and we cannot even touch your 1-1 ration you have going either. However, it is interesting to look at the glob of servers we do have looking. Stay strong! I see you are running Wordpress 2.7 as well Dan, very nice.

That’s quite the server farm you have going there. I will need to take a look at how many servers we have in back some time soon and list them as well. We will not beat you, and we cannot even touch your 1-1 ration you have going either. However, it is interesting to look at the glob of servers we do have looking.

Stay strong!

]]> Comment on Hyper-V by Bob http://www.nuclearweasels.com/2008/11/hyper-v/comment-page-1/#comment-45 Bob Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:37:44 +0000 http://www.nuclearweasels.com/?p=78#comment-45 Ah Marcus ... you should aim for 64GB! Ah Marcus … you should aim for 64GB!

]]> Comment on Hyper-V – Initial Testing by Bob http://www.nuclearweasels.com/2008/11/hyper-v-initial-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-44 Bob Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:37:08 +0000 http://www.nuclearweasels.com/?p=88#comment-44 To keep things separate originally ... and the kludgy install they are using for the current web server due to a past developer. To keep things separate originally … and the kludgy install they are using for the current web server due to a past developer.

]]> Comment on Hyper-V – Initial Testing by Taylor http://www.nuclearweasels.com/2008/11/hyper-v-initial-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-38 Taylor Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:11:22 +0000 http://www.nuclearweasels.com/?p=88#comment-38 Why virtualisation? What is the reason for it? ~Dan Why virtualisation? What is the reason for it?

~Dan

]]> Comment on Hyper-V – Initial Testing by Bob http://www.nuclearweasels.com/2008/11/hyper-v-initial-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-37 Bob Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:51:09 +0000 http://www.nuclearweasels.com/?p=88#comment-37 I understand. Right now I'm putting together a plan in my head to request we build a multi-user "blogging" system for the campus to use for both recruitment and other purposes, and part of it would be using virtualization to handle my server needs for the system. Sadly, I think the moment I mention "open source" I'm going to get some skeptical looks ... so I might have to test it at home first. I understand.

Right now I’m putting together a plan in my head to request we build a multi-user “blogging” system for the campus to use for both recruitment and other purposes, and part of it would be using virtualization to handle my server needs for the system. Sadly, I think the moment I mention “open source” I’m going to get some skeptical looks … so I might have to test it at home first.

]]> Comment on Hyper-V – Initial Testing by Taylor http://www.nuclearweasels.com/2008/11/hyper-v-initial-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-36 Taylor Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:14:09 +0000 http://www.nuclearweasels.com/?p=88#comment-36 I don't know, we haven't had much luck with virtualised mission critical servers - mainly because I think our procedures are a little too shoddy. I may if I have the inclination, I'll probably start migrating a domain controller or two across. We'll see on other services. ~Dan I don’t know, we haven’t had much luck with virtualised mission critical servers – mainly because I think our procedures are a little too shoddy.

I may if I have the inclination, I’ll probably start migrating a domain controller or two across.

We’ll see on other services.

~Dan

]]> Comment on Hyper-V – Initial Testing by Bob http://www.nuclearweasels.com/2008/11/hyper-v-initial-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-35 Bob Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:38:41 +0000 http://www.nuclearweasels.com/?p=88#comment-35 Were any animals harmed in these experiements!? Huh!? What about the animals, and the plants!?!?!?!?! Good to hear that it is working out well. Keep up the good articles. Are there any plans to move any mission-critical servers (like the ones you listed) to Hyper-V? Were any animals harmed in these experiements!? Huh!? What about the animals, and the plants!?!?!?!?!

Good to hear that it is working out well. Keep up the good articles. Are there any plans to move any mission-critical servers (like the ones you listed) to Hyper-V?

]]> Comment on Hyper-V by Nuclear Weasels » Hyper-V - Initial Testing http://www.nuclearweasels.com/2008/11/hyper-v/comment-page-1/#comment-34 Nuclear Weasels » Hyper-V - Initial Testing Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:51:13 +0000 http://www.nuclearweasels.com/?p=78#comment-34 [...] Yesterday I wrote about Hyper-V and how we plan to trail it, for those of you who haven’t read that entry yet you can find it here. [...] [...] Yesterday I wrote about Hyper-V and how we plan to trail it, for those of you who haven’t read that entry yet you can find it here. [...]

]]>